S.N.PATHAK
Md. Abul Qasim – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.N. PATHAK, J.
1. Heard the parties.
2. Petitioner has approached this Court for quashing part of order dated 30.05.2020 (Annexure-6), passed by respondent No. 3, the District Superintendent of Education, Giridih, whereby, two increment of salary of the petitioner was ordered to be withheld retrospectively from 2008 and it was decided to adjust difference amount consequent thereto from the retiral benefits of the petitioner. Petitioner has further prayed for direction upon the respondent to pay all consequential benefits as per fixation of his pension.
3. The facts of the case lies in a narrow compass. The petitioner was appointed to the post of Assistant Teacher on 10.02.1981 in primary School Manjhne Gawan. On 24.08.2006, when a surprise inspection was conducted by respondent No. 3, the petitioner was on leave but the respondent under misconception of facts, passed an order of suspension vide its order dated 06.09.2006 considering the petitioner on unauthorized leave. Thereafter, an enquiry was set-up against the petitioner and the Enquiry Officer, after conducting the Enquiry, submitted his report on 03.01.2008, finding the petitioner innocent and the allegation was foun
Anderson Wright and Co. vs. Amar Nath Roy
Harbanslal Sahnia vs. Indian Oil Corp. Ltd. (2003) 2 SCC 107
Managing Director, ECIL and Others vs. B. Karunakar and Others
Punjab National Bank and Others vs. Kunj Behari Misra
Sanjana M. Wig. vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd. (2005) 8 SCC 242
State of Punjab and Others vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer) and Others
Whirpool Corporation vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.