SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 670

G. P. MATHUR
Anderson Wright And Co. – Appellant
Versus
Amar Nath Roy – Respondent


Order

R.C. Lahoti, CJI—This order disposes of I.A.No. 4 of 2004 filed by the respondents seeking direction to appellants to pay or deposit, month by month, a fixed amount by way of mesne profits, as a condition precedent to the order staying execution of decree for eviction of appellants.

2. The suit property is situated in a prime locality of Kolkata. There are Governor House, High Court, Assembly, G.P.O., Reserve Bank of India, Income-tax office, Writer’s building, Telephone Bhawan etc., situated in the same area and some only at a walking distance from the suit property. Admittedly, the respondents are owner-cum-landlords of that part of the property which is held on tenancy by the appellants. The area in possession of the appellants is situated on the third floor and admeasures 6000 sq.ft. according to the respondents but is 5678 sq.ft. according to the appellants. The tenancy was created in the year 1939 at a monthly rent of Rs. 853.87p. per month.

3. The respondents initiated proceedings for the eviction of the appellants on the ground of the premises having been sublet or parted with possession by the appellants. The eviction was denied by the trial court. The appeal preferred













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top