IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAJESH SHANKAR, J.
Ramnath Yadav – Petitioner
Versus
The Jharkhand State Election Commission – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 4374 of 2021
Decided On : 31-03-2022
Reservation - Panchayat Mukhia Seat - Jharkhand Panchayat Raj Act, 2001, Section 21(A) - Rule 9(c) of the Jharkhand Panchayat Election Rules, 2001
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition to quash the reservation of the post of Mukhia of Ghaghari Panchayat for 'Scheduled Castes' (Woman) and to consider the petitioner for reservation of the seat/post for 'Other Backward Classes' (OBC). The petitioner argued that the reservation was against the provisions of Section 21(A) of the Jharkhand Panchayat Raj Act, 2001 and Rule 9(c) of the Jharkhand Panchayat Election Rules, 2001.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the reservation and allotment of seats for the Panchayat Elections were made in accordance with the provisions of the Act and Rules. The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner failed to show any infirmity in the procedure adopted by the respondents for allotting the seat of Mukhia in Ghaghari Gram Panchayat for SC (Women) candidate.
Issues: The main issue was whether the reservation of the post of Mukhia for 'Scheduled Castes' (Woman) in Ghaghari Panchayat was in contravention of the Jharkhand Panchayat Raj Act, 2001 and the Jharkhand Panchayat Election Rules, 2001.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the reservation and allotment of seats for the Panchayat Elections were made in accordance with the provisions of the Act and Rules. The court also emphasized that the reservation is not given to any category merely by taking into consideration the maximum population of that category, rather the same is given on the basis of the fixed procedure/methodology provided for the said purpose.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, finding it devoid of merit.
JUDGMENT :
RAJESH SHANKAR, J.
1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing part of the list dated 25.09.2021 prepared by the respondent No. 2 whereby the post of Mukhia of Ghaghari Panchayat has been reserved for ‘Scheduled Castes’ (Woman) and this is the third consecutive term when the said Panchayat seat of Mukhia has been reserved for the candidate belonging to Scheduled Caste which is against the provisions of Section 21(A) of the Jharkhand Panchayat Raj Act, 2001 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act, 2001’] and Rule 9(c) of the Jharkhand Panchayat Election Rules, 2001 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules 2001’]. Further prayer has been made for issuance of direction upon the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for reservation of the seat/post of Mukhia of Ghaghari Panchayat for ‘Other Backward Classes’ (OBC).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 25.09.2021, the respondent No. 2 published the list of reserved constituencies for the post of Mukhia to be elected by way of forthcoming third Panchayat Election (General) whereby the constituency of Ghaghari Panchayat has been reserved for the Scheduled Caste (Woman) in a most arbitrary and discriminatory manner ignoring the fact that the largest population in Ghaghari Panchayat belongs to Other Backward Classes (OBC) whereas the second largest population in the said Panchayat belongs to Scheduled Caste. Section 21-A of the Act, 2001 and Rule 9(c) of the Rules, 2001 provide that the post of Mukhia shall be reserved for the candidates belonging to the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes and women in different constituencies on rotation basis, however, the post of Mukhia of Ghaghari Panchayat has been reserved for the candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes for the third consecutive term.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that Article 243-O of the Constitution of India has restricted the Courts from intervening in the matter of delimitation of Panchayat constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies and as such the present writ petition is not maintainable. On bare perusal of Section 21-A of the Act, 2001 and the Rules, 2001, it would be evident that the percentage of reservations has to be given firstly to ST category then SC category and thereafter rest of the seats are to be reserved for OBC category, subject to the upper limit of 50% of the total seat. Further, at least 50% reservation has to be given to the women in each category including General (Other) category. The allotment of all seats has to be made on rotation basis by the District Magistrate as per Rule 15 of Rules, 2001 under the supervision, direction and control of the State Election Commission. On the basis of percentage of population in Sagma Block, total number of seats for the post of Mukhia are 5. Out of these, two posts are reserved for the SC as per their population in Sagma Panchayat Samiti (Block) and rest three posts are reserved for other categories as per their population in the said Panchayat Samiti. In the year 2015, election of 5 numbers of above posts of Mukhia was held on the basis of the percentage of their respective population wherein as per second proviso to Rule 11(1) of the Rules, 2001, the SC was allotted 2 seats whereas Others (General) were allotted 3 seats. In the year 2021, the population being the same, the reservation is also to be in the same manner. Hence, the allotment is as follows: (i) Backward Classes (ii) Others (General) (iii) Scheduled Tribes and (iv) Scheduled Castes on the basis of rotation in descending and cyclic order. As such, the ‘Others’ (General) have been allotted 3 seats and the SC have been allotted 2 seats. In the first Panchayat Election held in the year 2010, the rotation for these 5 seats of Mukhia in Sagma Block was as follows: (i) Scheduled Tribes (ii) Scheduled Castes (iii) Backward Classes (iv) Others (General) which was changed in the year 2015 as (i) Sche
The reservation and allotment of seats for Panchayat Elections must be made in accordance with the provisions of the Jharkhand Panchayat Raj Act, 2001 and the Jharkhand Panchayat Election Rules, 2001....
The court emphasized that the State Legislature has decided to rotate the seats of reserved categories, exercising its discretion in favor of the rotation of seats only, and quashed the impugned gaze....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that reservation is with reference to the category/caste to which the person belongs and not the nature of the constituency from which they were el....
Allotment of seats to others-The Election Commission shall after having allotted seat reserved for the Schedule Castes, Schedule Tribes and socially and educationally backward classes under rules 4, ....
A constituency shall be reserved for backward classes only if the population of backward classes is greater than 5% of the total population in that particular constituency.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the reservation for the post of Sarpanch was rightly determined by drawing lots from the members belonging to Scheduled Castes category and Ba....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.