JUDGMENT :

W.P.(C) No. 3382 of 2021 was initially filed for quashing the order as contained in memo No. 615 dated 12.08.2021 passed by the respondent No.3 whereby the petitioner was permanently blacklisted. However, during pendency of the present writ petition, the respondent No.3 vide order as contained in memo No. 24 dated 07.01.2022 amended the impugned order dated 12.08.2021 fixing the period of blacklisting as five years and thereafter vide office order as contained in memo No. 472 dated 26.04.2022, reduced it to three years mentioning inter alia that the earlier orders as contained in memo No. 615 dated 12.08.2021 as well as memo No. 24 dated 07.01.2022 were recalled vide memo No. 471 dated 26.04.2022. The petitioner has therefore also challenged the orders dated 07.01.2022 and 26.04.2022 passed by the respondent No.3.

2. Cont. Case (Civil) No. 548 of 2021 has also been filed against the opposite party No.2 for wilful disobedience and non-compliance of the order dated 27.01.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 01 of 2020.

3. Learned Sr. counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of passing of the order dated 27.01.2020, the O.P. No.2 failed to make formal communication