Back
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Ankit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. I.A. No. 4330 of 2022 has been filed for ignoring the defect no. 9(v).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in para 3 of the said interlocutory application it has been disclosed that part of Annexure-2 is a web copy of the order dated 30.06.2017 passed in A.B.P. No. 1155 of 2017 and it was downloaded from the e-Court website.
3. In view of statement made in para 3 of the interlocutory application, prayer is allowed.
4. Defect no. 9(v) is ignored.
5. I.A. No. 4330 of 2022 stands disposed of.
6. Heard Mr. Prashant Kr. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Soumitra Baroi, learned counsel for the O.P. No.2
7. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceedings in connection with Lalpur P.S. Case No. 121 of 2017, corresponding to G.R. No. 2049 of 2017, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi .
8. Mr. Prashant Kr. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that allegation for abduction of informant, F.I.R. has been lodged. He further submits that supervision note is in favour of the petitioners and in that view of the
The power of the Court to quash criminal proceedings based on compromise between the parties and the absence of societal interest, as established in the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Nari....
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties and the absence of societal interest, as guided by the judgments of Narinder Singh & Ors. and Gian Singh.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the power of the High Court to quash criminal proceedings in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction, considering the absence of societal interest....
The Court has the power to quash criminal proceedings in cases where the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak, and continuation of the case would cause oppression and prejudice to the accuse....
The court's decision was influenced by the principle that the power to quash a criminal proceeding based on a compromise between the parties should consider the nature of the crime, societal impact, ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that in cases of settled disputes with no societal interest or chance of conviction, the court may exercise its power to quash criminal proceedings....
The court has the power to quash criminal proceedings in cases involving compromise between the parties, considering the nature and gravity of the crime, societal impact, and the fairness of continui....
The court can quash criminal proceedings under section 482 Cr.P.C. if there is no chance of conviction, no societal interest is involved, and the parties have compromised, as established in the judgm....
The court has wide plenitude with no statutory limitation to quash a criminal proceeding in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction to secure the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of a....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the Court's authority to quash criminal proceedings, including F.I.R., in cases of compromise between the parties, based on the nature and gravi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
