SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Raj Kumar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Dhananjay Kr. Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. P.C. Sinha, learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner has filed this quashing application for quashing the order taking cognizance dated 07.09.2010 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in Complaint Case No.327 of 2009, whereby, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offence under Sections 304-A of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma.
3. The lodging of the said complaint case was on the facts that the contractor Suresh Prasad Yadav had taken contract work for construction of one drain on the road near Shitla Mata Mandir at Devi Mandap Road and it has been alleged in the complaint case that it was responsibility of all the accused persons to look after the work of the drainage. It has been alleged in the complaint case that accused Suresh Prasad Yadav with the consent of all the accused persons had cut road and after digging on the middle road, the accused persons had not made any arrangement of security nor any barrier was made on the road. It has also been alleged in the complai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.