SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 543

RAJESH SHANKAR
Ram Dhani Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Shashank Saurav, adv

JUDGMENT :

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is allowed to correct the designation of the respondent no.3 as ‘Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Ghatshila’.

2. Necessary insertion in the cause title of the writ petition be made in course of the day.

3. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing/setting aside the order dated 29th October, 2021 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition) passed by the Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Ghatshila- respondent no.3 in Rent Fixation Case no.08 of 2020-21, whereby the petitioner’s application for fixation of rent has been rejected. Further prayer has been made for issuance of direction upon the concerned respondents to consider the petitioner’s application for fixation of rent in terms with Chotanagpur Revenue Collection Rules.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order dated 29th October, 2021. It appears that the respondent no.3 vide impugned order dated 29th October, 2021 has declined to entertain the petitioner’s application for fixation of rent with respect to the land in question on the ground that no document relating to survey made under Section 80 of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 (hereinaft

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top