RAJESH SHANKAR
Ram Dhani Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is allowed to correct the designation of the respondent no.3 as ‘Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Ghatshila’.
2. Necessary insertion in the cause title of the writ petition be made in course of the day.
3. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing/setting aside the order dated 29th October, 2021 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition) passed by the Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Ghatshila- respondent no.3 in Rent Fixation Case no.08 of 2020-21, whereby the petitioner’s application for fixation of rent has been rejected. Further prayer has been made for issuance of direction upon the concerned respondents to consider the petitioner’s application for fixation of rent in terms with Chotanagpur Revenue Collection Rules.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order dated 29th October, 2021. It appears that the respondent no.3 vide impugned order dated 29th October, 2021 has declined to entertain the petitioner’s application for fixation of rent with respect to the land in question on the ground that no document relating to survey made under Section 80 of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 (hereinaft
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.