SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 738

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Nageshwar Sahu @ Lepa – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Deepak Kumar.
For the Respondents: Rajesh Kumar Singh, Sunil Kumar Dubey.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

1. Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the State.

2. This petition has been taken through Video Conferencing in view of guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.

3. This petition has been filed for quashing of the order taking cognizance dated 26.02.2015, whereby the learned Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the offence under Section 147, 149, 304 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioners in Protest-cum-Complaint Case No. 3156 of 2014, pending in the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi.

4. The prosecution case is based on protest-cum-complaint petition filed by Maqbool Ansari against the petitioners. The complainant/informant earlier lodged the case and subsequently the police has submitted final form thereafter a protest-cum-complaint case being No. 3156 of 2014 was filed and in the complaint case, it was alleged

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top