SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 830

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, RATNAKER BHENGRA, JJ.
Pradeep Manjhi @ Yadav, S/o. Laddu Manjhi & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondent
Criminal Appeal (DB) Nos. 1116, 1077, 1395 of 2018 with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 574 of 2019
Decided On : 11-04-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Adv., Mr. Madan Prasad, Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha No.4, Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmed.
For the State : Mrs. Priya Shreshtha, Spl.PP.

The court allowed the criminal appeals.

Headnote:

Judgment - Criminal Appeal - The court allowed the criminal appeals.

Fact of the Case:

The court pronounced judgment in open court.

Finding of the Court:

Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1116 of 2018, Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1077 of 2018, Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1395 of 2018 and Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 574 of 2019 are allowed.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi:

Final Decision: The signed judgment shall be kept in the original files.

JUDGMENT :

1. Judgment is pronounced in the open Court.

2. Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1116 of 2018, Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1077 of 2018, Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1395 of 2018 and Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 574 of 2019 are allowed.

3. The signed judgment shall be kept in the original files.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top