SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 908

SANJAY PRASAD
Naresh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Prabir Kumar Chatterjee, A.P.P.

ORDER :

I.A No.3214 of 2022

The present Interlocutory Application No.3214 of 2022 has been filed by the appellants for suspension of sentence and grant of bail during the pendency of this criminal appeal.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and the learned A.P.P for the State.

3. One another supplementary affidavit filed on 04.05.2022 on behalf of the appellant No.2 and 3 for grant of provisional bail to the appellant Nos.2 and 3 on account of marriage of their respective daughter and son on 13.05.2022 and 12.05.2022 respectively.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that during the pendency of this criminal appeal, the marriage of the daughter of the appellant No.2 namely, Ashok Yadav and the son of the appellant No.3 namely, Rajendra Yadav are fixed on 13.05.2022 and 12.05.2022 respectively.

5. It is submitted that the appellants are innocent. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants that there is allegation of alleged firing upon the appellant No.2 and no specific overt act has been attributed against the appellant No.1 Naresh Yadav and the appellant No.3 Rajendra Yadav. It is further submitted that there is a case and counter-case betwe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top