SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 928

NAVNEET KUMAR
Makku Kole – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Ashok Sinha.
For the Respondent: Mrs. Nihala Sharmim, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of admonition dated 02.07.2003 passed by 4th Additional sessions Judge, Deoghar in Sessions Case No. 256 of 2001 whereby and where under the appellants were convicted for the offence punishable u/s 323 of IPC and in spite of awarding the sentence the appellants were directed to be released after due admonition.

2. Briefly stated the prosecution story as set out in the FIR is as under :

The informant Rohan Kole (P.W.6) stated that on 14.12.2000, at about 5 p.m. his cousin-accused Makku Kole came to the house of informant Rohan Kole (P.W. 6) and asked him to flee from that place claiming that he had no right to live there. The informant replied that he was living over the property of his maternal uncle and he was not occupying the property of anyone else, thereupon a dispute arose between both the parties. Then the co-accused Khaku Kole having lathi in his hand, Lakhandeo Kole holding lathi in his hand, Gurucharan Kole holding lathi in his hand and Chhotelal Kole having tangi in his hand came there and Khaku Kole caught the informant and the accused-appellant Makku Kole assaulted with lathi with intent to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top