Back
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
Md. Yasin Ansari S/o Late Yakeen Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioners have challenged the judgment dated 28th February 2015 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 27 of 2011 by which their conviction and sentence awarded in G.R. Case No. 251 of 2006 corresponding to Trial No. 279 of 2011 under section 12 of the Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act, 2005 (in short Bovine Animal Act) have been affirmed.
2. The only ground urged on behalf of the petitioners is that since the petitioners tendered evidence of purchase of the bovine animals provisions under sections 3 and 4 are not attracted and while so conviction and sentence awarded to them under section 12 of the Bovine Animal Act cannot sustain.
3. On the basis of the self-recorded statement of Shashikant Subhansu Kuzur, SI, on 2nd June 2006 at 11:00 PM, a First Information Report vide Kuru PS Case No. 51 of 2006 was registered under section 3/4 of the Bovine Animal Act against Md. Yasin Ansari, Md. Aleem Quraishi and Md. Firoz Quraishi. After the investigation a charge-sheet was laid and cognizance of the offence was taken under section 3/4 of the Bovine Animal Act, finding a prima facie case against them under section 12/15 of the said Act.
4. In course of the trial, two wit
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the seizure under Section 10(3) of the Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act must be made by a competent authority and the f....
Convictions under the Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Cattle Preservation Act require clear and cogent evidence, and mere transportation of cattle without documentation does not suffice to ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the accused, prima facie guilty of causing cruelty to the animals, was not entitled to interim custody of the seized cattle.
Section 35 of the Act provides that for proper care and treatment of animals in respect of which offences under this Act have been committed, such animal can be kept in pinjrapole with a direction th....
The Act does not provide for confiscation of the vehicle, and forfeiture can only occur after a trial concludes with a conviction. The commercial nature of the vehicle and relevant legal provisions a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
