JUDGMENT :

ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.

1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants.

2. No one turns up on behalf of the respondents in spite of repeated calls. Hence, this appeal is heard and disposed of ex-parte against the respondents.

3. This Second Appeal, under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 31.03.2010 passed by learned Additional District Judge, F.T.C. (I), Garhwa in Title Appeal No. 09 of 2006 whereby and where under the learned Additional District Judge, F.T.C. (I), Garhwa in the judgment of concurrence, has dismissed the appeal and confirmed the judgment and decree passed by the Sub-Judge II, Garhwa in Title Suit No. 33 of 1986 dated 02.03.2006.

4. The case of the plaintiffs in brief is that Bakhori Jolaha was recorded as occupancy raiyat of the suit land during the settlement operation in the year 1917-18. Bakhori Jolaha had two sons and one daughter and the plaintiff and the proforma defendant No. 21 are the descendants of Bakhori Jolaha. It is the further case of the plaintiffs that on the death of Bakhori Jolaha, the suit land devolved upon them as per the shares under the Muslim Law. It is also the case