SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 1025

NAVNEET KUMAR
Rajeev Kumar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: A. Awinash Kumar.
For the Respondent: Priya Shrestha.

ORDER :

1. Learned counsels for the petitioner and learned Spl. P.P. for the State are present.

2. No one has appeared for the O.P. No. 2.

3. Heard the parties present.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that this Cr.M.P. has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding in connection with C.P. Case No. 1863 of 2008 including the order taking cognizance dated 01.12.2010 by which the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Dhanbad passed the summoning order finding prima facie case for the offence punishable u/s 403 and 417 of IPC against the several accused persons including the petitioner Rajeev Kumar Sinha as one of them.

5. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the O.P. No. 2/complainant had filed one complaint vide Complaint Case No. 1863/2008 and briefly pointing out the allegations as set out in the said Complaint that the complainant/O.P. No. 2 was borrower of a financial institution namely IndusInd Bank for the purchase of a Tempo under Hire Purchase Agreement after getting finance from the said bank and this petitioner, at the relevant point of time, was the In-charge (legal) of the said bank and joined the organizati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top