S. N. PATHAK
Duryodhan Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jhrkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard the parties.
2. The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing the entire departmental proceeding initiated vide Memo No. 2059 dated 24.6.2019.
3. The case of the petitioner lies in a narrow compass. While the petitioner was posted as District Superintendent of Education, Ramgarh during the period 2012-14, a complaint was made regarding illegalities and corruptions in construction of additional two rooms in Upgraded Urdu Girls High School, Chitarpur, Ramgarh. On enquiry it was found that there was no requirement of construction of two additional rooms. On the basis of the said finding, a departmental proceeding was initiated by framing a memo of charge contained in Memo No. 2059 dated 24.6.2019 (Annexure-2) under the proviso to Rule 43(b) of the Jharkhand Pension Rules. No show cause / explanation was asked from the petitioner after framing the memo of charge. However, after the enquiry report submitted by the Enquiry Officer on 26.6.2019, an opportunity of personal hearing was provided to the petitioner by letter dated 8.1.2021 by the Director, Primary Education, Jharkhand, whereby the petitioner replied that he is not guilty.
4. Learned c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.