SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 101

GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Subhash Kumar Datta – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: L.C.N. Sahdeo
For the Respondents: Priya Shrestha, Shadab Eqbal.

JUDGMENT :

GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.

1. The instant Cr. M.P. has been filed for quashing the order taking cognizance dated 23.09.2022 in connection with Complaint Case No. 443 of 2018 registered under Sections 420, 468, 467, 379, 384, 323, 120B of the Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25A and 26/35 of the Arms Act.

2. As per the case of the Complainant, land measuring 0.83 decimal of Khata No. 22 Plot No. 64 was purchased by Chapla Devi registered deed vide registered deed No. 2290 dated 06.05.1946.

3. In 1990, one Ghulam Subhani purchased 76 decimal by a forged registered deed being 17373 of the year 1990 appertaining to Khata No. 91, Village-Korra area 76 decimal which was sold to Sunil Kumar and Madhuri Singh by him in 1992 vide registered deed No. 1912 and 1914, which was subsequently mutated in their name.

4. The main allegation is that Registration Department, Hazaribagh in collusion with the land mafias changed the Khata No. 91 to Khata No. 22 by rectification deed. This was done by the petitioner (A9), who at the relevant time was the Registrar, in collusion with the Circle Officer, Inspector and Circle karamchari Hazaribagh and land mafias in the year 2018.

5. It is submitted on be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top