GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Subhash Kumar Datta – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
1. The instant Cr. M.P. has been filed for quashing the order taking cognizance dated 23.09.2022 in connection with Complaint Case No. 443 of 2018 registered under Sections 420, 468, 467, 379, 384, 323, 120B of the Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25A and 26/35 of the Arms Act.
2. As per the case of the Complainant, land measuring 0.83 decimal of Khata No. 22 Plot No. 64 was purchased by Chapla Devi registered deed vide registered deed No. 2290 dated 06.05.1946.
3. In 1990, one Ghulam Subhani purchased 76 decimal by a forged registered deed being 17373 of the year 1990 appertaining to Khata No. 91, Village-Korra area 76 decimal which was sold to Sunil Kumar and Madhuri Singh by him in 1992 vide registered deed No. 1912 and 1914, which was subsequently mutated in their name.
4. The main allegation is that Registration Department, Hazaribagh in collusion with the land mafias changed the Khata No. 91 to Khata No. 22 by rectification deed. This was done by the petitioner (A9), who at the relevant time was the Registrar, in collusion with the Circle Officer, Inspector and Circle karamchari Hazaribagh and land mafias in the year 2018.
5. It is submitted on be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.