SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, RATNAKER BHENGRA
Suresh Tirkey, son of Late Kanhu Tirkey – Appellant
Versus
Governor, through its Principal Secretary under Administration and control of the Scheduled Areas – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shree Chandrashekhar, J.
WP(C) No. 4907 of 2021 filed by Sonu Pascal Ekka son of late Esrael Ekka and WP(C) No. 4953 of 2021 filed by Suresh Tirkey son of late Kanhu Tirkey both residents of village Bara Ghaghra within the district of Ranchi in the State of Jharkhand were dismissed on 31st March 2022. By this order, the writ Court rejected their challenge to the notice communicated through letter dated 25th October 2021 and public notice dated 23rd December 2021, for removing encroachments over the lands belonging to Ranchi Municipal Corporation (in short, RMC).
2. Suresh Tirkey and Sonu Pascal Ekka have challenged the aforesaid order dated 31st March 2022 passed by the writ Court.
3. The writ petitioners who are appellants before us claimed right, title and interest over Plot Nos. 57 and 58 under Khata No. 328 in village Bara Ghaghra which are recorded in the name of their ancestors in the cadastral survey record of rights. They pleaded that their fathers/forefathers were in khas possession of the aforesaid lands before 1908 (when Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act came into force) and after their death they have been peacefully enjoying the stated properties. On such pleadings, they
Debashish Soren v. State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Krishna Ram Mahale v. Shobha Venkat Rao
Lallu Yeshwant Singh v. Rao Jagdish Singh
Ram Kirpal Bhagat v. State of Bihar
Ratansingh v. Vijaysingh & Ors.
Shri Raja Durga Singh of Solon v. Tholu & Ors.
Sopan Sukhdeo Sable v. Asstt. Charity Commr.
State of J&K v. Haji Wali Mohd.
Sundargarh Zilla Adivasi Advocates Association & Ors. v. State of Odisha & Ors.
The applicability of the Jharkhand Municipal Act, 2011 in the District of Ranchi and the allowance for existing laws relating to State Municipalities to operate for a specified period.
A person in unauthorized occupation of government land cannot be evicted summarily if they have a bona fide claim to the property. The encroachment proceeding should only be initiated if it is clear ....
Point of Law : Amended provisions of Rule 18 (2) of the Settlement Rules does not mandate issuance of any notice upon persons coming in the ambit of the said sub-rule. The petitioner are admittedly i....
Challenging a Show Cause Notice invoking a court's writ jurisdiction is premature and discouraged by the mandate of the law. A Show Cause Notice does not give rise to a cause of action unless there i....
The court ruled that an unregistered lease does not confer rights, and amendments changing the nature of a petition are impermissible if no enforceable rights exist.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.