IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
Gopal Bhagat - Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondent
Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 898 of 2004
Decided On : 21-06-2023
Deception - Conviction under Section 493 of the Indian Penal Code - Section 493 - Summary
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was convicted and sentenced for deceiving a woman into believing they were lawfully married under Section 493 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim alleged that the appellant had committed rape and assured to marry her, leading to a continued physical relationship. The appellant later refused to marry her, resulting in the case being filed against him.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that although the appellant had deceived the victim into believing he would marry her, he did not claim to be her legally wedded husband, a key element of Section 493. Therefore, the conviction under Section 493 was deemed unsustainable.
Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant's actions constituted an offense under Section 493 of the IPC, involving deceit leading to a false belief of lawful marriage and cohabitation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court analyzed the essential elements of Section 493 and referred to the judgment in the case of Arun Singh & others versus State of Uttar Pradesh to determine the practice of deception and the requirement for the victim to believe she was lawfully married.
Final Decision: The court allowed the criminal appeal, quashed the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence, and discharged the appellant from the liability of his bail bond.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence, both dated 31.05.2004, passed by the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. I, Godda, in Sessions Case No. 20 of 2004; whereby the appellant was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and fine of Rs.2,000/- under Section 493 of the Indian Penal Code and in default of fine, further to undergo simple imprisonment for one month.
3. The prosecution case in brief is that the informant-Shaili Murmu resided with her mother and brother as his father was no more and the appellant used to come her house as he was the friend of his elder brother. One day when the informant was cutting grass then the appellant came there and has committed rape and when she raised the objection, the appellant assured to marry her. Thereafter, physical relationship between the informant and the appellant continued. In the meantime, the appellant gave maintenance as rice and cloths etc. to the informant and this fact was also known by the mother of the informant. After some period, the appellant refused to marry with the informant and because of that the case has been instituted by the informant against the appellant.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though initially the appellant was charged for the offence under Section 376 of the IPC, however, the learned trial court has acquitted him for the same. However, he committed an error convicting the appellant for the offence under Section 493 of the IPC on the ground that there is evidence against the accused that he deceived the victim girl Shaili Murmu into believing that she has lawful married woman and made her live as a husband and wife. The aforesaid finding of the trial court is perverse in nature; as such the appellant deserves acquittal.
5. Learned APP opposed the prayer for acquittal and submits that the learned trial court has not committed any error in convicting the appellant.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the documents available on LCR, it appears that to decide this case as to whether it is a case of 493 IPC or not, it is relevant to appreciate Section 493 IPC which is quoted herein below:
7. From the aforesaid provision of law, it is clear that if any person deceives a woman who is not legally married to him but to believe her that she is legitimately married to him and to cohabit or have sexual intercourse with him.
In this background, the deposition of the victim girl which has been narrated in para 1 of her deposition is quoted herein below:
Further, it is also relevant to mention paragraph 9 of the impugned judgment which is extracted as under:
Fro
Arun Singh & others versus State of Uttar Pradesh through its Secretary reported in (2020) 3 SCC 736
Deception leading to a false belief of lawful marriage and cohabitation is essential for an offense under Section 493 of the IPC.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of deceit causing a false belief of existence of a lawful marriage for the offence under Section 493 of the Indian Penal Code, and ....
No deceit was established regarding the marriage, leading to the appellant's acquittal under S.493 of the Penal Code.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the victim to be under the full impression that the accused is her husband to establish the offense under Section 493 IPC.
Strict proof of marriage is required to sustain charges under Section 494 IPC; concealment of prior marriage constitutes cheating under Section 417 IPC.
Consent for sexual intercourse must be voluntary and not procured through a misconception of fact, as established under Section 375 and Section 90 of the Indian Penal Code.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.