SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
workmen represented by General Secretary – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The instant writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein, the part of the award, by which, instead of reinstating the workmen in service with the consequential benefits, the compensation to the tune of Rs.12,000/-was awarded to the workmen, has been assailed.
2. The brief facts of the case, as per the pleading made in the writ petition, are required to be enumerated reads as under:-
It is the case of the writ petitioner that on 14.12.2002, the Govt. of Jharkhand, Dept. of Labour & Employment by its notification no.3063 referred the following disputes for adjudication:-
This reference was sent to the Labour Court, Ranchi where it was registered as Reference No.2 of 2003. The Union and the Management both appeared, filed their respective written statements and furnished their evidences also.
It is the further case of the writ petitioner-workmen that since the Management was not paying even the minimum wages to the workmen and on behalf of them
Babu Verghese and Ors. vs. Bar Council of Kerala and Ors.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai vs. Anjum M.H. Ghaswala & Ors.
Jaipur Zila Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Limited Vrs. Ram Gopal Sharma & Ors.
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Singhara Singh and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.