SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 174

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Ranveer Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Mr. Rishav Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. Indrajit Sinha assisted by Mr. Rishav Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, learned counsel for the State.

2. The present petition has been filed for quashing of entire criminal proceeding including order taking cognizance dated 07.08.2012 in connection with C/2 Case No. 388/2012, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur.

3. The complaint has been filed by the O.P. No. 2 alleging therein that on the alleged date of inspection i.e. 16.05.2012 it was found that no proper Ambulance Room was maintained nor doctor and para medical officers were appointed which was in gross violation of Section 45(4) of the Factories Act and also Rule 65 of the Jharkhand Factories Rule, 1950.

4. Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is occupier and the petitioner no. 2 is Manager of the factory namely Tata Hitachi. He further submits that on 31.03.1999 Telco Construction Equipment Company Limited was come into existence by separation from the parent company i.e. Tata Motors Limited. He further submits that from 05.12.2012 Telco Construction Equipment Company Limited is now k

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top