Back
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, NAVNEET KUMAR
Md. Shahid S/o Late Wahid Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
I.A. No. 8722 of 2022
1. This interlocutory application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 112 days in preferring this Letters Patent Appeal.
2. Heard.
3. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the parties and the averments made in the interlocutory application more particularly at paragraph-7 thereof, we are of the view that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause in preferring the appeal within the period of limitation.
4. Accordingly, I.A. No. 8722 of 2022 is allowed and delay of 112 days in preferring the appeal is condoned.
L.P.A. No. 391 of 2022
5. The instant intra-court appeal preferred under Clause-10 of Letters Patent is directed against the order/judgment dated 13.04.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. (S) No. 1736 of 2011, whereby and whereunder, the decision taken in memo no. 190 dated 09.02.2011, by which, the representation of the writ petitioner was rejected for his appointment as Constable in terms of advertisement being Advertisement No. 01/2004.
6. The brief facts of t
Candidates are bound by the terms of the advertisement and the standing order, and cannot challenge the selection process after participating in it.
Candidates are bound by the terms of the advertisement and the standing order, and they cannot challenge the selection process after participating in it. The competent authorities have the discretion....
A candidate who participates in a selection process wherein the eligibility criteria as well as the criteria for selection are disclosed beforehand cannot, upon being unsuccessful, turn around and co....
Eligibility for appointment is strictly governed by the criteria set in the recruitment advertisement and relevant rules, preventing any claim for relaxation post-appointment without stipulated guide....
Eligibility criteria for recruitment must be consistent and cannot be altered after the process has commenced, as affirmed by the Supreme Court.
The main legal point established is that the plea for parity with appointed candidates is not applicable if the petitioner had not been appointed, and the court has the authority to quash an order if....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
