SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Gulab Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Jitendra Shankar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms. Nehala Sharmin, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, learned counsel for opposite party no.2.
2. This petition has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding arising out of C1 Case No.29 of 2010 including the order dated 08.04.2010 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, whereby, cognizance has been taken against the petitioners under Sections 323, 341, 342, 384, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, now pending in the court of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur. Vide order dated 03.02.2023, I.A. No.251 of 2023 was allowed by the coordinate Bench of this Court and by the said order, the order dated 22.11.2022 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur on the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 245(1) Cr.P.C. in C1 Case No.29 of 2010 was allowed to be challenged in this petition and interim order was granted.
3. The complaint case was filed by opposite party no.2 alleging therein that the complainant had given his house located at holding no.31, Khasmahal on rent to the accused Sunil Singh in A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.