JUDGMENT :

DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This revision application is directed against the judgment dated 04.05.2006 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sahibganj in Cr. appeal No. 12 of 2005; whereby the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 17.03.2005 passed by the S.D.J.M. Sahibganj in O.C.R. Case No. 181 of 1991(T.R. No. 369 of 2005); whereby the petitioner was found guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 466 and 468 IPC and sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of three years for the charge under section 420 IPC and further sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of 3 years for the offence under sections 466 and 468 IPC, has been affirmed and appeal filed by petitioner was dismissed.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on the basis of the enquiry report (Ext.4) of the S.D.O. Sahibganj, the Circle Officer, Sahibganj, pursuant to the direction, vide letter no. 282 dated 15.03.1991 (Ext.-2) of Additional Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj, filed a complaint in the court of the learned C.J.M, Sahibganj against the petitioner, who is revenue Halka Karamchari of Mauza-Hajipur Bisrampur, Diyara, Sahibganj, allegi