Back
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, NAVNEET KUMAR
Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS in short), through Dr. Ashok Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Department of Health, Medical and Family Welfare – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) :
1. It needs to refer herein that the order under challenge in L.P.A. No. 313 of 2021 is dated 02.09.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(S) No. 6311 of 2012 which pertains to the issue of appointment of residents/senior residents while the order under challenge in L.P.A. No. 615 of 2017 is dated 06.12.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(S) No. 2274 of 2015 which pertains to the issue of appointment of Tutors in RIMS, Ranchi.
2. The issue in both the writ petitions was regarding whether residents/senior residents/tutor is the permanent post and the writ petitioners who have been appointed either as residents or senior residents or tutors are for a tenure of three years or their appointment is permanent in nature.
3. The writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 6311 of 2012 decided on 02.09.2021, subject matter of L.P.A. No. 313 of 2021, has been answered in favour of the writ petitioner, namely, Manoj Kumar Bakshi, by quashing and setting aside the order as contained in Memo No. C-815 dated 28.10.2012. While, the writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 2274 of 2015 decided on 06.12.2017, subject matter of L.P.A
The main legal point established in the judgment is that employees appointed to tenure posts for a specified period cannot claim permanence or continuance of their tenure beyond the specified period,....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the acceptance of terms and conditions of employment, which clearly indicate the nature of the post as a 'tenure post' for a fixed period, pre....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appellant was not entitled to antedated appointment, and the principle of res judicata did not apply to the subsequent writ petitions file....
The court upheld the validity of appointments made under the reservation policy, emphasizing that claims regarding seniority must be raised timely and that errors in selection processes should not pe....
The court upheld the validity of appointments made under the reservation policy, emphasizing that challenges to such appointments after a significant delay are barred by principles of delay and lache....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
