SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 587

PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Nikhil Oraon – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: A.K. Sahani.
For the Respondent: Pankaj Kr. Mishra.
For the Informant : Atul Kr. Tiwari.

ORDER :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Ranchi Case No. 30 of 2022 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 376(2)(n), 417 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail.

Factual Matrix

3. The FIR was lodged by prosecutrix on 21.12.2022 at Mahila Police Station at Ranchi with allegation that prosecutrix was studying and residing at Ranchi since in the year 2011. It is further alleged that in course of study, in the year 2013 she met with present petitioner which turned into friendship and both started frequently visiting each other at their home. Meanwhile, on 14.01.2014 present petitioner pressurized the prosecutrix for having physical relationship which she refused then he assured that both are in love and he also wants to solemnize marriage with her then there should be hurdle in establishing sexual intercourse which continued since long. But in the year 2021 when the prosecutrix proposed and putting pressure on him for marriage then petitioner visited to her family members in the month of March, 2021 and negotiated about solemnizing marriage and fixed da

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top