RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, DEEPAK ROSHAN
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kapoor – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
1. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment dated 22.05.2019, passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (herein after referred as ITAT), SMC Bench, Ranchi in ITA No. 86/Ran/19 preferred by the assessee-respondent; wherein the learned ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and reverse the order of CIT appeal who has sustained the addition of income and chargeability of interest passed by the Assessing Officer.
2. Brief fact of the case is that the Assessee is an individual and deriving income from trading of spare-parts of motorcar and mobile phones and filed its return of income declaring total income at Rs. 6,61,080/- electronically on 17.09.2015. The case of the Assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment. In response to notices, the Assessee appeared and produced all books of accounts, papers and documents. In course of assessment proceedings, the Assessee voluntarily surrendered the LTCG for taxation. But the A.O. added the entire receipt from sale of shares amounting to Rs. 10,45,266/- including the cost price/investment made by the Assessee amounting to Rs. 5,40,000/- as unexplained investment u/s 69 of the Act vide its order
Hotel Balaji vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
India Cement Ltd. vs. State of Tamil Nadu
In Re: Ministry of Information and Broadcasting
Mamleshwar Prasad vs. Kanhaiya Lal
Mayuram Subramanian Srinivasan vs. CBI
Nirmal Jeet Kaur vs. State of M.P. (2004) 7 SCC 558 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 1989
State of West Bengal vs. Kesoram Industries Ltd. (2004) 10 SCC 201
State of U.P. vs. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. (1991) 4 SCC 139
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.