RAJESH SHANKAR
Jai Prakash Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order as contained in memo No. 36 dated 13.02.2001 (Annexure-6 to the writ petition) issued under the signature of the respondent No.3 by the order of the respondent No.4 imposing following punishments upon the petitioner:-
(ii) Since the charges levelled against the petitioner regarding indiscipline, arbitrariness and negligence in distribution of Red Cards/deposit of collected amount have been proved, his two increments with non-cumulative effect are being withheld.
(iii) Period of unauthorized absence of the petitioner be treated as without salary.
(iv) Nothing will be paid to the petitioner, except subsistence allowance during the period of suspension.
(v) The petitioner’s suspension is being revoked with direction to enter all the remarks in his service-book.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, after being
Punjab National Bank & Ors. Vs. Kunj Behari Misra
Lav Nigam Vs. Chairman & MD, ITI Ltd. & Anr.
Vijay Shankar Pandey Vs. Union of India & Anr.
Union of India & Ors. Vs. Mohd. Ramzan Khan
Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad & Ors. Vs. B. Karunakar & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.