ORDER :

The petitioner is aggrieved of the order dated 29th September 2016 by which cognizance of the offence under sections 323, 325, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken and the matter was fixed for appearance of Hafiz Kayum, Md. Aajam Ansari, Habibullah Ansari and Chhotu Ansari.

2. Grievance of the petitioner is that though sufficient materials were produced before the Magistrate on the basis of which cognizance of the offence under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code should have been taken, and processes should have been issued as also against the other accused persons against whom charge-sheet was not filed.

3. This criminal revision petition came on Board for hearing on 17th January 2017.

4. On that day further proceeding in connection to Sadar (Satbarwa) PS Case No. 95 of 2016 was stayed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court.

5. This criminal revision petition was listed on 16th February 2022 and at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner hearing of this criminal revision petition was postponed for today. A request for pass over was made in the morning by Mr. Ankur Anand, the learned vice-counsel, on the ground that Mr. Mahesh Tewari, the learned co