SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 907

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.
Niranjan Kumar Sah - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand and ors. - Respondents
W.P. (Cr.) No. 597 of 2022
Decided On : 03-04-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate, Mr. Aman Dayal Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Devesh Krishna, S.C. (Mines)-III Mr. Faisal Allam, A.C. to S.C. (Mines)-III

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions of the Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006 have an overriding effect over the Indian Penal Code, and the procedure for launching prosecution under the Act must be followed.

Headnote:

Food Safety and Standard Act - Quashing of Criminal Case - Sections 272, 273, 419, 420 of IPC and Section 52/59/63 of the Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006 - The court discussed the provisions of the Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006 and their overriding effect over the Indian Penal Code. The court highlighted the procedure for launching prosecution under Section 42 of the Act, 2006 and concluded that the petitioner cannot be prosecuted under the mentioned sections.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a sole proprietor of a firm, was accused of illegal processing of oil and misbranding of food products. The Food Safety Officer lodged an FIR under Sections 272, 273, 419, 420 of IPC and Section 52/59/63 of the Act, 2006.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the prosecution failed to follow the procedure for launching prosecution under Section 42 of the Act, 2006, and concluded that the petitioner cannot be prosecuted under the mentioned sections.

Issues: The main issue was whether the prosecution can stand against the petitioner in absence of following the procedure under Section 42 of the Act, 2006.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Food Safety Officer can lodge the case with the recommendation of the Commissioner of Food Safety, and in absence of following the procedure for launching the prosecution under Section 42 of the Act, 2006, the petitioner is not liable to be prosecuted under the mentioned sections.

Final Decision: The entire criminal case arising out of the FIR was quashed, and the petition was allowed and disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. Saurabh Shekhar assisted by Mr. Aman Dayal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Devesh Krishna assisted by Mr. Faisal Allam, learned counsel for the State.

2. This petition has been filed for quashing the entire criminal case arising out of FIR being Mahagama P.S. Case No.222 of 2022, dated 03.11.2022, registered for the offences under Sections 272, 273, 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code along with Section 52/59/63 of the Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006 (herein after to be referred to as the 'Act, 2006), pending in the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda. So far as prayer no.(ii) made in this petition with regard to direction to the respondents to release the entire food and edible items (including non-edible Mahuwa oil), Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner is not pressing prayer no.(ii) in view of the order passed by the revisional court, whereby, the seized articles have been directed to be released in favour of the petitioner.

3. The FIR being Mahagama P.S. Case No.222 of 2022 has been lodged under Section 154 Cr.P.C. on 03.11.2022. The incident of offence has been noted as “Running of Factory of Oil Mill Illegally”. The date of occurrence is 03.11.2022 and FIR has been registered at 16:00 hours. The place of occurrence has been noted as Mohanpur, Mahagama, in the district of Godda. The complainant in the case in Moeen Akhtar, son of Md. Yasir Ansari, who is appointed as Food Safety Officer. The FIR has been lodged against the petitioner, who is the sole proprietor of M/s. Sah and Sons Industries. The information has been registered by Sub-Inspector, namely, Rajendra Yadav, who is the I.O. of the present case, on the complaint lodged by the above Food Safety Officer. The prosecution case is that the Designated Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Officer, Mahagama had passed an order dated 03.11.2022 according to which the petitioner has indulged in illegal processing of oil at his factory situated at Mahagama and the godown near St. Michael School at village Khadharamal was being illegally operated. The Food Safety Officer has conducted spot inspection of the allegations mentioned in the order dated 03.11.2022 passed by the Designated Officer, along with other officers like Executive Magistrate, Mahagama, Circle Officer, Mahagama and Sub-Divisional Officer, Mahagama at 16:00 hours on 03.11.2022. The raids were conducted at two places, i.e. the Oil Mill and the Godown, one after next, wherein the officers would find the set-up unit of Oil Mill in the back side rooms of the Oil Factory. Thereafter in the same unit, sacks of the Mahuwa seeds (Kochara) were found in stock. In the front room of the factory sealed and packed oil boxes, Chana Dal, Arhar Dal, Chawal, Besan etc. were found in the sacks. Thereafter, raid was conducted in the nearby godown, where the stock of Mahuwa seeds “Kochara” were found and further oil tanker bearing Registration No. BR-01GB-2845 was found there. In the first floor, the sacks of Chawal, Dal, Chana etc. were found kept. It was also found over there that Mahuwa seeds (Kochara) were stocked. The items found at both the places were seized and inspection-cum-seizure list was prepared. It was found that the petitioner, through its factory was engaged in processing the non-edible oil (including non-edible Mahuwa oil) and different brands of mustard oil tins were used to pack them, which is against the Rules of Food Safety and Standard Authority of India (FSSAI). These types of oil are bad for human consumption and can be fatal to human life. At the time of inspection, the petitioner/owner of the unit did not show up on repeated calls. Further no documents/papers were produced of the seized items. The inspection further disclosed that there was misbranding of food products like Chana, Chana Dal, Besan, Arhar Dal, where no manufacturing date, expiry date, batch number, manufacturing company was disclosed in the sack containing the

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top