JUDGMENT :

NAVNEET KUMAR, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the informant.

2. The Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 270 of 2005 along with I.A. No. 1036 of 2018 is separated from the Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 857 of 2003 along with I.A. No. 1035 of 2018 in hand.

3. This appeal is directed against the Judgment of conviction and order or sentence dated 27.05.2003 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, FTC, Deoghar, in S.C. Case No. 330 of 2001, arising out of Madhupur P.S. Case No. 165 of 2000, corresponding to G.R. No. 440 of 2000 and T.R. No. 889 of 2001, whereby and where under the appellants have been convicted under Section 498-A of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and six months and also fined Rs. 1,000/- each and in default of fine, it is further ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months.

4. Learned counsel for the defence counsel further submitted that a joint compromise petition was vide I.A. No. 1035 of 2018, by which, it has been pointed out that compromise has been taken place between the husband and wife and their family members.

5. Learned counsel Mr. Nivas Roy appearing on