Soma Munda S/o Late Mango Munda vs State of Jharkhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 1022

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Soma Munda S/o Late Mango Munda – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: B.R. Rochan.
For the Respondent: Mahua Palit.

JUDGMENT :

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.

1. Heard Mr. B.R. Rochan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners.

2. Heard Ms. Mahua Palit, learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State.

3. From perusal of the order-sheets of the case, it appears that Order No. 12 dated 29.09.2021 has been wrongly typed as Order No. 12 dated 29.07.2021. Accordingly, Order No. 12 dated 29.07.2021 be treated as Order No. 12 dated 29.09.2021.

4. The present criminal revision application is directed against the judgment dated 07.08.2012 passed by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XVI, Ranchi in Criminal Appeal No. 148/2011 whereby and whereunder the conviction of the petitioners under Sections 144 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code passed by the learned trial court has been affirmed and they were acquitted for the charges under Sections 447 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and the criminal appeal filed by the petitioners has been partly allowed.

5. The learned trial court vide judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 30.08.2011 passed by the learned Sub-Divis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 1022

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARYSoma Munda S/o Late Mango Munda – AppellantVersusState of Jharkhand – Respondent

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Soma Munda S/o Late Mango Munda – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent