SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Badari Osta, S/o. Late Mohan Osta – Appellant
Versus
Panchu Osta, S/o. Indar Osta – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Indrajit Sinha, the learned counsel assisted by Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah and Mr. Rishabh Kumar, the learned vice counsels appearing on behalf of the appellants.
2. This Second Appeal has been filed being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the order/ judgment dated 30.08.2012 (decree signed on 17.09.2012) passed by learned District Judge-I, Dumka in Title Appeal No.10 of 1998 whereby the learned appellate court has been pleased to dismiss the appeal preferred by the appellants and has confirmed the judgment dated 19.02.1997 (decree signed on 09.07.1998) passed by learned Sub-Judge-II, Dumka in Title Suit No.37 of 1988.
3. Title Suit No.37 of 1988 has been instituted by the appellant/ plaintiff for declaration of the adoption of defendant no.1 was not valid and the registered deed dated 26.06.1969 was fraudulent, illegal, invalid and inoperative. The prayer of the cost of the suit was also prayed.
4. The learned trial court by the judgment dated 19.02.1997 after discussing the evidence on record has been pleased to dismiss the suit and in that view of the matter, the plaintiff has filed the Title Appeal No.10 of 1998 which was dismissed by the judgment dated 30.08.2012 by th
Laxmibai (Dead) through LRS & Another Vs. Bhagwantbuva (Dead) through LRS. and Others
Vadivelu Thevar v. State of Madras
Jagdish Prasad v. State of M.P.
Sunil Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Namdeo v. State of Maharashtra
Bipin Kumar Mondal v. State of W.B.
Kishan Chand v. State of Haryana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.