S. N. PATHAK
Sanjay Kumar Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for quashing the office order as contained in Memo No. 150, dated 28.06.2014, issued under the signature of Principal Incharge, Government Polytechnic, Dumka by which his service has been cancelled and the office order issued vide Memo No. 413, dated 17.09.2013 has been made ineffective with immediate effect so far petitioner is concerned. Petitioner has further prayed for a direction upon the respondents to regularise his service to the post of Lecturer (Electronics) since he has rendered his service under the respondents since 1995. Petitioner has also prayed for a direction upon the respondents restraining them to give effect to the impugned order as contained in Memo No. 150, dated 28.06.2014, till decision for permanent absorption/ regularization of his service is taken by the respondents.
3. According to the petitioner, he was appointed as a temporary part time Lecturer in the year 1995 vide letter no. 327, dated 11.09.1995 on payment of consolidated amount of Rs. 1,300/- per month under the Govt. Polytechnic, Dumka and used to take 4 to 6 classes per day regularly similar to
Hargurpratap Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in (2007) 13 SCC 292
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi and others Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in (1991) 1 SCC 212
Narinder Singh Ahuja & Ors. Vs. the Secretary, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare & Ors.
Narendra Kumar Tiwari Vs. State of Jharkhand
State of Karnataka v. Umadevi (3)
State of Haryana v. Piara Singh reported in (1992) 4 SCC 118
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.