SUBHASH CHAND
Bhim Mian, son of Late Nepal Mian – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 29.07.2011 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Giridih in Sessions Trial No. 180 of 2002 arising out of Bengabad P.S. Case No.31 of 2001, G.R. No.517 of 2001, whereby the learned trial Court has convicted the appellant under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with a fine of Rs.2000/-. In default of payment of fine, the appellant was further directed to undergo RI for one month.
2. The brief facts leading to this Criminal Appeal as per the prosecution case is that on 24.03.2001 at about 02:00 am two persons intruded in the veranda, where the informant Kedar Singh was sleeping and they asked him to open the door. The wife of Kedar Singh, namely, Dropadi Devi was sleeping in the room and after hearing the noise, she came and opened the door. Thereafter, 3-4 persons intruded in the house. One miscreant showed the weapon and told the informant to sit in veranda and two persons started assaulting the wife of the informant and also abused her. When the wife of the informant wanted to raise alarm, the miscreant
Lahu Kamlakar Patil v. State of Maharashtra
Behari Prasad v. State of Bihar (1996) 2 SCC 317: 1996 SCC (Cri) 271
Bahadur Naik v. State of Bihar (2000) 9 SCC 153: 2000 SCC (Cri) 1186
Arvind Singh v. State of Bihar
Rattanlal v. State of J&K (2007) 13 SCC 18: (2009) 2 SCC (Cri) 349
Ravishwar Manjhi v. State of Jharkhand (2008) 16 SCC 561: (2010) 4 SCC (Cri) 50
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.