IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, DEEPAK ROSHAN, JJ.
The State of Jharkhand - Appellant
Versus
Md. Rahet Seikh @ Kaluwa Seikh - Respondent
Death Reference (D.B.) No.04 of 2022 With Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.47 of 2023
Decided On : 10-06-2024
POCSO - Conviction and Sentencing - Sections 302, 376(2)(i) IPC; Section 6 POCSO Act - The court discussed the legal provisions under Sections 302 and 376(2)(i) of the IPC, which pertain to murder and rape, respectively, alongside Section 6 of the POCSO Act, which addresses aggravated sexual assault against children. The court emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence in cases relying on circumstantial evidence, particularly the 'last seen' theory, and highlighted the absence of direct evidence linking the accused to the crime, ultimately leading to the decision to overturn the conviction.
JUDGMENT :
R. Mukhopadhyay, J.
Heard Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned P.P.
2. In Cr. Appeal (DB) No.47 of 2023 the appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 01.12.2022 (sentence passed on 12.12.2022) passed by Shri Sanjay Kumar Dubey, Learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Rajmahal in POCSO Case No.65 of 2021 whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 376(2)(i) of the I.P.C. and Section 6 of the POCSO Act and has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. One Lakh under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and in the event of nonpayment of fine, simple imprisonment of one year shall be served by him, rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. One lakh for the offence under Section 376(2)(i) of the I.P.C. and in the event of non-payment of fine, simple imprisonment of one year shall be served by him and he has also been sentenced to death for the offence under Section 302 of the I.P.C.
3. The prosecution case arises out of the Fardbeyan of Balagat Sarfaraj recorded on 05.03.2015 at 00.30 hours at village Jonka in which it has been stated that his 6 year old daughter Tayyaba Anjum was everyday taken away by his neighbour Md. Rahet Seikh @ Kaluwa for playing and on completion of her play time he would return her back to her home. As per the daily routine yesterday i.e. on 4.3.2015 at 5.00 P.M. Md. Rahet Seikh had taken his daughter on his shoulder for playing. When the daughter of the informant did not return till late evening, he and his wife started searching for his daughter in the nearby places including the house of Md. Rahet Seikh but she could not be traced out. In course of search Md. Wasim and Imam Seikh had disclosed that his daughter was seen being taken away by Md. Rahet Seikh on his shoulder towards Simla Pokhar field and at this information the informant along with his relatives and villagers reached Simla Pokhar and in course of search the dead body of the daughter of the informant was found in the wheat field of Waris Seikh. There were marks of bruises on the neck and a black spot. The dress worn by the daughter of the informant was in a dishevelled state.
4. Based on the aforesaid allegations Rajmahal P.S. Case No.81 of 2015 was instituted against Md. Rahet Seikh @ Kaluwa under Sections 376/302 I.P.C. On completion of investigation, charge sheet was submitted and after cognizance was taken the case was committed to the court of sessions. Charge was framed under Sections 376/302 I.P.C. against the accused which was read over and explained to the accused to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The charge was amended on 08.10.2021 and an additional charge was framed under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. On committal of the case it was registered as S.T. No.95 of 2015 but after the charge was amended the case was registered as POCSO Case No.65 of 2021.
5. The prosecution has examined as many as 12 witnesses in support of its case.
6. P.W. 1 Imam Seikh has stated that the incident is of 2 years back at 5.30 PM when he was returning from his field when he had seen Kaluwa going towards Simla Pokhar with the 6-7 years old daughter of the informant on his shoulder. There was an uproar in the evening that Tayyaba Anjum has become traceless at which he had gone to the house of Tayyaba Anjum and informed her parents about seeing Tayyaba going with Rahet Seikh. At this, several villagers went towards Simla Pokhar and adjacent to Simla Pokhar in the wheat field of Waris the dead body of the child was found. There were scratches in the neck of the child and blood was oozing out from her private parts.
In cross-examination, he has deposed that it was evening and darkness was descending. His field is about 1 KM ahead of Simla Pokhar and a lot of people travel on that road. He had not asked Kaluwa as to where he was taking the child. The commot
Point of Law : Contradictory statements regarding extra judicial confession made by the accused/appellant, we are of the view that such type of extra judicial confession has no such value in the eye ....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of considering the testimonies of witnesses, especially in child rape cases, and the need for proper legal protection for minor victims.
Point of Law : Evidence suggesting that the accused was seen in the company of the deceased on the date of occurrence can at best raise grave suspicion about his involvement but the same.
Circumstantial evidence must establish a conclusive chain consistent with the accused's guilt; suspicion cannot replace proof beyond reasonable doubt in criminal convictions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for corroborative evidence in circumstantial cases, the scrutiny of child witness testimony, and the application of the 'last seen ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.