HARISH KUMAR, CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Hassan Sarwar, S/o Nabi Karim – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the prosecution's case and initial investigation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. evidence presented by prosecution witnesses regarding the events. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 21) |
| 4. court's observations on the defendant's guilt and evidence. (Para 23 , 24 , 40) |
| 5. court's analysis of circumstantial evidence and its implications. (Para 26 , 30 , 50) |
| 6. arguments presented by the appellant's counsel. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. legal principles related to circumstantial evidence established. (Para 31 , 33 , 38) |
| 8. final conclusion of the court and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 54) |
JUDGMENT :
HARISH KUMAR, J.
Heard Mr. Iqbal Asif Niazi, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The present appeal has been preferred by the sole appellant assailing the impugned judgment of conviction dated 11.04.2016 and order of sentence dated 12.04.2016 respectively passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Darbhanga in Sessions Trial No. 306 of 2013, arising out of Simri P.S. Case No. 28 of 2013 whereby the appellant has been held guilty and convicted under Sect
Amit @ Ammu Vs. State of Maharashtra
Chandrakant Ganpat Sovitkar and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Krishna Kumar Malik’s vs. State of Haryana
Mohibur Rahman v. State of Assam
Rambraksh @ Jalim Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
State of West Bengal Vs. Mir Mohammad Omar
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.