JUDGMENT :

DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Since all these appeals arise out of same impugned judgment, as such all were heard together and decided by this common judgment.

3. These appeals have been preferred by the appellants challenging the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, both dated 23.01.2020 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Simdega in S.T. No.43/2018 arising out of Kurdeg P.S. Case. No. 21/17 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 179/17; whereby the appellants have been convicted for the offence under Sections 25(1-A)/35, 26(2)/35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 (1) (2) of C.L.A. Act and the appellants were sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of five years each along with fine of Rs.10,000/-each and in case of default, further R.I. of six months each for the offence under Section 25(1-A)/35 of Arms Act and R.I. for a period of five years each along with fine of Rs.10,000/-each and in case of default, further R.I. of six months each for the offence under Section 26(2)/35 of the Arms Act and further sentenced to undergo R.I. of six months for the offence under Section 17 (1) of C.L.A. Act and R.I. of two years for the offence under