Back
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, AMBUJ NATH
Sudhir Hansda – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, learned counsel appearing for the appellant(s) and Ms. Nehala Sharmin, learned Spl.P.P.
2. The aforesaid appeals arise out of the same impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence. Accordingly, all these appeals are being disposed of by a common judgment. The appellants Ramu Soren, Samu Soren, Satya Besra and Ruplal Hansda [In Cr. Appeal D.B. No. 83 of 2017] and appellant Sudhir Hansda [In Cr. Appeal D.B. No. 88 of 2017] and appellants Dhalku Soren @ Dholku Soren and Kamoli Murmu @ Komali Murmu [In Cr. Appeal D.B. No. 94 of 2017] have file these appeals against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22.12.2016 (sentence passed on 23.12.2016), passed by Sri Vijay Kumar-II, the then learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamtara, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 49 of 2011, arising out of Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 89 of 2010, corresponding to G. R. No. 521 of 2010, whereby and wherein, learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamtara held the appellants guilty of offence under sections 148/ 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code and thereby sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence under sections 302/149 of
The right to private defense can be invoked in property disputes, and the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, including the consideration of mutual injuries and the context of the a....
[The court established that in cases of sudden quarrel without premeditation, the appropriate charge may be modified from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, emphasizing the importan....
The central legal point established is the right of private defence of property under section 103 of the Indian Penal Code, and its application in cases of land disputes and self-defence.
The judgment established the importance of proving common intention and individual culpability in cases of collective criminal actions, emphasizing the need for evidence of pre-arranged concert and i....
(1) A case and counter case arising out of same incident should always be tried by same Court.(2) Right to private defence – Reasonable apprehension of death or genuine apprehension of grievous hurt ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
