RAJESH SHANKAR
Bodhi Pandit – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of missing person case. (Para 1) |
| 2. investigation details and allegations. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. issues related to witness testimonies. (Para 10) |
| 4. lapses in investigation highlighted. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. concerns on investigative methods. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 6. judgments on the investigation's quality. (Para 23) |
| 7. recommendations for police improvements. (Para 24) |
| 8. conclusions on the investigatory process. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 9. actions to be taken against erring officials. (Para 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
The present writ petition was initially filed by Tekni Devi W/o Sri Teklal Pandit (hereinafter referred as the original petitioner) for issuance of direction upon the respondents, particularly, the Superintendent of Police, Giridih (the respondent No.2) to take legal action against the named accused persons of Bagodar (Sariya) P.S. Case No. 88 of 2010 dated 07.05.2010 instituted for the offence under Sections 366(A)/34 of IPC as the accused persons were roaming freely in the locality and were even seen with the local police. Further prayer wa
Dayal Singh Vs. State of Uttaranchal reported in (2012) 8 SCC 263
Nagesh Vs. State of Karnataka reported in (2012) 6 SCC 477
Manohar Lal Sharma v. Union of India
Pooja Pal Vs. Union of India & Ors. reported in (2016) 3 SCC 135
Ram Bihari Yadav Vs. State of Bihar reported in (1998) 4 SCC 517
State of Gujarat Vs. Kishanbhai & Ors. reported in (2014) 5 SCC 108
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.