JUDGMENT :

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.

1. This second appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the concurrent findings of the learned trial court and the first appellate court passed in Title Suit No. 83 of 1997 and Title Appeal No. 56 of 2013 respectively, whereby and whereunder the suit of the plaintiff has been dismissed.

Factual Matrix of the Case

2. Factual matrix of the case is that appellant/plaintiff has filed the suit for a decree of declaring his right, title and interest over the suit scheduled property B land measuring an area 3 decimals fully described in Schedule B to the plaint and also for declaration that the Parcha issued under the BPPHT Act, 1947 (Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act, 1947) is infructuous and confirmation of possession over the suit property and alternatively, if plaintiff is found dispossessed for restoration of possession of suit property and also for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men and agents from disturbing the plaintiffs possession in any manner along with cost of the suit.

3. According to plaintiff, he is the owner of the Schedule-A property having right title and continuous possession which was pu