IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.
The State of Jharkhand, through the Principal Secretary, Human Resource Development and Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Rohit Kumar Gupta, s/o Ramjeevan Sah and Anr. – Respondents
L.P.A No. 510 of 2023 With L.P.A No. 513 of 2023 With L.P.A No. 521 of 2023 With L.P.A No. 522 of 2023 With L.P.A No. 527 of 2023 With L.P.A No. 528 of 2023 With L.P.A No. 532 of 2023 With L.P.A No. 533 of 2023 With L.P.A No. 534 of 2023 With L.P.A No. 536 of 2023 With L.P.A No. 537 of 2023 With L.P.A No. 539 of 2023 With L.P.A No. 542 of 2023 With L.P.A No. 543 of 2023
Decided On : 31-01-2024
[TEACHER APPOINTMENT] - [JHARKHAND PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHER APPOINTMENT RULES] - [Jharkhand Elementary School Teachers Appointment Rules, 2012; Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India] - [The court addressed the legality of the appointment process for teachers in Jharkhand, emphasizing the need for adherence to the Jharkhand Elementary School Teachers Appointment Rules, 2012. It highlighted the arbitrary denial of appointments to eligible candidates and the necessity of conducting counseling for unfilled vacancies. The court interpreted Articles 14 and 16, ensuring equal treatment and non-discrimination in the selection process, which influenced its decision to direct the state to conduct further counseling for the remaining vacancies.]
JUDGMENT :
Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. A batch of 77 writ petitions were disposed of vide common judgment dated 16th February 2022 passed in W.P.(S) No. 2378 of 2019 (Paras Nath Mandal v. State of Jharkhand) and other cases. The present 14 appeals arise out of the following writ petitions which were also part of the aforesaid batch of the writ petitions.
3. The case number of the present L.P.A(s) and the corresponding writ petition(s) are as under:
ii. L.P.A No. 513 of 2023 arising out of W.P.(S) No. 2710 of 2019,
iii. L.P.A No. 521 of 2023 arising out of W.P.(S) No.2660 of 2019,
iv. L.P.A No. 522 of 2023 arising out of W.P.(S) No.2678 of 2019,
v. L.P.A No. 527 of 2023 arising out of W.P.(S) No. 4383 of 2019,
vi. L.P.A No. 528 of 2023 arising out of W.P.(S) No. 3136 of 2019,
vii. L.P.A No. 532 of 2023 arising out of W.P.(S) No. 2867 of 2019,
viii. L.P.A No. 533 of 2023 arising out of W.P.(S) No. 2879 of 2019,
ix. L.P.A No. 534 of 2023 arising out of W.P.(S) No. 3106 of 2019,
x. L.P.A No. 536 of 2023 arising out of W.P.(S) No. 5120 of 2019,
xi. L.P.A No. 537 of 2023 arising out of W.P.(S) No. 6140 of 2019,
xii. L.P.A No. 539 of 2023 arising out of W.P.(S) No.3766 of 2019,
xiii. L.P.A No.542 of 2023 arising out of W.P.(S) No.2871 of 2019
xiv. L.P.A No. 543 of 2023 arising out of W.P.(S) No. 2577 of 2019.
4. The reliefs as prayed for in various writ petitions are as under: -
“1. That by the instant writ petition the petitioners pray before this Hon’ble Court to issue necessary direction(s)/order(s)/writ(s) commanding upon the Respondent Authorities to consider the application and candidature of petitioners under the Non-Para category for the remaining vacant seats of Inter Trained Teacher 1 to 5 (Non-Para) and to further consider the candidature of the petitioners for the remaining vacant seats and if the petitioners are found entitled then they shall be given appointment as they had already applied for the aforesaid vacancies at their respective districts in the year 2015.”
(ii) L.P.A. No. 513 of 2023 arises out of W.P.(S) No. 2710 of 2019. The petitioners approached the writ Court with the following prayers:
“1. That by the instant writ petition the petitioner prays before this Hon’ble Court to issue necessary direction(s)/order(s)/writ(s) commanding upon the Respondent Authorities to consider the application of petitioners under the Non-Para category and to allow the petitioner to appear and participate in the counseling process for the selection of Inter-Trained Teacher Appointment 1 to 5 (2015-16) under the Non-Para Teacher Category vacancy as his name has appeared at Sl no. 85 under the Provisional Merit List of Teacher Appointment 1 to 5 (2015-16) Non-Para for district of Dumka published on 15.05.19.”
(iii) L.P.A. No. 521 of 2023 arises out of W.P.(S) No. 2660 of 2019. The petitioners approached the writ Court with the following prayers:
“a. For issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) in the nature of certiorari for quashing the final merit list (annexure-1) published by the respondent authorities in terms of which the candidates lesser marks than the petitioners have been short listed for selection in the post of Inter Trained Teacher Class-1 to 5, under the para teacher category for the counseling to be held on 03.06.2019 and the names of the petitioner who have higher marks than the said candidates have been left out from the counseling process.
And/ Or
b. For issuance of an appropriate provision in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the respondents authorities to publish a fresh merit list including the names of the petitioners for participating in the counseling for selection in the post of Inter Trained Teacher Class-1 to 5 under Para Category as peti
The court emphasized adherence to judicial precedents, directing authorities to accommodate eligible candidates in the counseling process based on merit, ensuring fair treatment and timely compliance....
The court mandated the state to comply with prior orders for counseling of eligible teachers, emphasizing timely completion and adherence to selection criteria.
The court emphasized the necessity for compliance with prior judicial orders in the counseling process for Assistant Teachers, prioritizing merit and eligibility of candidates.
The court directed the initiation of counseling for eligible candidates based on merit, emphasizing compliance with prior judicial orders.
The court mandated that candidates with higher marks must be allowed to participate in the counseling process, reinforcing principles of fairness and compliance with previous judgments.
The legal principle established is that the entitlement for appointment as Assistant Teachers is based on merit and not on the category under which the applicants applied.
The court mandates compliance with prior orders for teacher counseling, emphasizing merit-based inclusion of eligible candidates.
The court ruled that exclusion from the merit list despite higher scores constitutes arbitrariness, necessitating compliance with prior judicial directions for fair counselling.
Para teachers scoring higher than non-para candidates are entitled to participate in counseling for Assistant Teacher positions, as affirmed by prior judicial orders.
[The court established that degrees from Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deoghar are valid for government appointments prior to 26/02/2015, and emphasized the importance of following judicial directives in recruit....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.