IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Kanchan Ojha @ Kanchan Kumar Ojha S/o Ashrfi Ojha – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Cr. M.P. No. 2070 of 2022
Decided On : 28-07-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the seized cash. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the release of funds. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on prior rulings. (Para 5) |
| 4. instructions for releasing the amount via indemnity. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. conclusion to allow the petition. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
1. Heard the parties.
2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a prayer for quashing the order dated 12.04.2022 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in Misc. Criminal Application No. 474 of 2022 arising out of Sadar P.S. Case No. 578 of 2019, corresponding to G.R. No. 861 of 2020 by which the order for release of the cash amount of Rs.2,57,87,680/- to transfer the same in the account of SIS Cash Services Private Limited is disposed of as rejected.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner drawing attention of this Court to the order passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr.M.P. No. 892 of 2021 dated 10.01.2022, a copy of which kept at Annexure-13 at page no. 151-153 of the brief submits that an amount of Rs.4,07,53,000/- was looted while transaction of the said cash was being done by the SIS Cash Services Private Limited and for that FIR was lodged and in the first instance, a sum of Rs.2,57,87,680/- was seized by police which has been kept in the safe custody of State Bank of India, Kutchery Branch, Ranchi. Drawing attention of this Court to paragraph nos.5 and 6 of the said order passed in Cr.M.P. No. 892 of 2021, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the State Bank of India and Union Bank of India both have intimated this Court that SIS Cash Services Private Limited has indemnified the said two banks. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is absolutely no dispute that the said money was seized from the custody of SIS Cash Services Private Limited and the petitioner is the authorized representative of SIS Cash Services Private Limited and a copy of the resolution of the board of director has been filed indicating that the petitioner is the authorized person to sign and submit all necessary documents on behalf of the company in the said case. Drawing attention of this Court to Annexure-A of the supplementary affidavit dated 14.07.2023, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the same is the detail particulars of the bank account of the SIS Cash Services Private Limited but the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi on some flimsy reasons without application of mind, has rejected the prayer of the petitioner for release of the said amount. Drawing attention of this Court to Annexure-A of the supplementary affidavit dated 08.09.2022 filed on behalf of the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the same is the no objection certificate for recovery of the cash by SIS Cash Services Private Limited agreed by EPS (Electronic Payment And Services Pvt. Ltd.) and Annexure-B is the no objection certificate issued by the FIS Payment Solutions And Services Pvt. Ltd. Hence, the said order dated 12.04.2022 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in Misc. Criminal Application No. 474 of 2022 arising out of Sadar P.S. Case No. 578 of 2019, corresponding to G.R. No. 861 of 2020 being not sustainable in law be set aside and order be passed directing release of the said amount.
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the State has no objection if the amount is transferred to the bank account of the SIS Cash Services Private Limited, the details of which has been mentioned in Annexure-A of the supplementary affidavit dated 14.07.2023.
5. Having heard the submissions made at the Bar and after going through the materials in the record, it is crystal clear that in view of the order passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr.M.P. No. 892 of 2021, the learne
A writ petition for the release of seized money can be granted if ownership is established and the State has no objection, provided an indemnity bond is furnished.
Property seized in relation to a crime must be released to lawful owners unless substantiated otherwise.
Money belongs to the organization in view of the silence maintained by the petitioner in claiming the said amount either during the trial or in his statement made under Section 342 of Cr.P.C.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for compliance with statutory procedures, particularly in the context of the seizure of property under Section 102 of the Criminal ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.