RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, DEEPAK ROSHAN
Bidhku Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.
1. Heard Mr. A.K. Kashyap, learned senior counsel for the appellants and Mr. Vishwanath Roy, learned Special P.P.
2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 31.07.1993 passed by Smt. Shakuntala Sinha, learned 7th Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi in Sessions Trial No. 231 of 1988, whereby and whereunder, the appellants have been convicted for the offence punishable u/s 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life.
3. The prosecution case arises out of the fardbeyan of Balkahi Ganjhuain (PW-4), wherein it has been stated that on 16.04.1988 at about 8 p.m. her husband Manbodh Ganjhu had gone out to urinate and as soon as he sat down, Bidhku Mahto, Dinesh Mahto, Balku Mahto and Bhunuwa Mahto and another person in a concerted fashion had committed assault upon her husband with Bhujali, Tangi and Bhala which resulted in her husband falling down. When she tried to save her husband Bidhku Mahto had assaulted her with a Tangi and forcibly removed her. Manbodh Ganjhu in an injured state tried to flee, but fell down in the field of Karma Mahto. It has bee
The court ruled that reliance on a solitary eyewitness was misplaced due to inconsistencies, leading to the conclusion that the conviction was not supported by reliable evidence.
The conviction for murder based solely on a solitary eyewitness's testimony was overturned due to contradictions and lack of corroboration from other witnesses.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for corroboration and independent evidence in criminal cases, especially when the conviction is based on the sole testimony of a wi....
The court upheld a conviction for murder based on eyewitness testimonies, affirming that the familiarity of rural witnesses with the accused overcame visibility doubts.
Eyewitness testimony must be credible and reliable; an unconscious witness cannot provide valid evidence against an accused.
The necessity of corroborative evidence in cases of murder and the interpretation of common object under Section 149 IPC, emphasizing that mere presence at the scene does not equate to participation ....
A conviction under IPC requires reliable evidence; mere last seen theory without corroboration cannot sustain a guilty verdict.
Conviction for murder upheld based on consistent eyewitness accounts despite concerns about the independence of witnesses, highlighting the relevance of cohesive testimonies over minor contradictions....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to carefully assess and evaluate witness testimonies, and the extension of the benefit of doubt in case of contradictions and in....
The court emphasized that contradictions in eyewitness testimonies undermine the prosecution's case, necessitating the reversal of convictions due to insufficient evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.