SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 729

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Rongon Mukhopadhyay, Deepak Roshan, JJ.
Jogi Oraon @ Jogindra Oraon and ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondent
Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 440 of 2001
Decided On : 03-07-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Ms. Kavita Kumari, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Saket Kumar, A.P.P.

The conviction based on inconsistent eye-witness testimony was overturned, highlighting the necessity for credible evidence in criminal cases.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302/34 - Conviction and sentence - Appellants convicted for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment - Evidence of sole eye-witness found inconsistent and unreliable - Delay in FIR registration questioned - Trial court's appreciation of evidence flawed - Judgment and order of conviction set aside. (Paras 17, 18)

(B) Evidence - Eye-witness testimony - Sole eye-witness's account deemed inconsistent and unnatural - Failure to take immediate action to rescue victim raises doubts on credibility. (Paras 16, 17)

Facts of the case:
The prosecution case arises from the assault on Narain Baraik, resulting in his death, with the appellants convicted based on the testimony of the informant, who was also the sole eye-witness.

Findings of Court:
The trial court's conviction was based on flawed appreciation of evidence, leading to the conclusion that the appellants were wrongfully convicted.

Issues: The main issues were the credibility of the sole eye-witness and the delay in FIR registration.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the inconsistencies in the evidence of the sole eye-witness undermined the prosecution's case, leading to the conclusion that the trial court erred in convicting the appellants.

Result: Appeal allowed.

JUDGMENT :

R. Mukhopadhyay, J.

Heard Ms. Kavita Kumari, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Saket Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 20.09.2001 (sentence passed on 29.09.2001) passed by Shri Prashant Kumar, learned Sessions Judge, Gumla in Sessions Trial No. 126 of 1998 whereby and whereunder the appellants have been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of I.P.C. and have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.

3. The prosecution case arises out of the fard beyan of Kunka Baraik who has stated that on 21.11.1997 he had come to Dumartoli and was staying with his in-law’s family for the last one week. The informant’s elder brother-in-law namely, Narain Baraik had 1.14 acres of land at Kumhar More and on that land, he was constructing a house under Indira Awaas Yojna. The informant was looking after the construction work along with his brother-in-law. It is alleged that in the night of 20.11.1997, while the informant was sleeping along with his brother-in-law, the accused persons variously armed had come and after abusing the brother-in-law of the informant had started assaulting him with axe, bhujali, farsa and lathi, as a result of which the brother-in-law of the informant became unconscious and when he tried to rescue him, he was also threatened by the accused persons. After committing the assault, the accused persons had left the place of occurrence. The informant thereafter intimated about the incident to Ram Lakhan Baraik who had arrived with Hira Nath Baraik and the villagers had also arrived. The injured Narain Baraik was referred to Sisai Referral Hospital, where in course of treatment, he died. It has been alleged that the ancestors of Jogi alias Jogindra Oraon (appellant no. 1) had donated 1.14 acres of land in Bhudan which was later on settled with the deceased Narain Baraik upon which he was constructing a house and on account of the same, there was a land dispute which resulted in the incident.

4. Based on the aforesaid allegations, Sisai P. S. Case No. 122 of 1997 was instituted against the accused persons under Sections 302/34 of I.P.C. After completion of investigation, charge-sheet was submitted and after cognizance was taken, the case was committed to the court of Sessions where it was registered as S. T. No. 126 of 1998. Charge was framed under Sections 302/34 of I.P.C. against the accused persons to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

5. The prosecution in course of trial has examined 6 witnesses in support of its case.

6. P.W. 1 – Hiranath Baraik did not support the case of the prosecution and was declared hostile.

7. P.W. 2 – Ram Lakhan Baraik has stated that on the date of the incident, he was in his house, when his brother-in-law Kunka Baraik had come late at night and informed him that his elder brother-in-law Narain Baraik has been assaulted. On this information, he had informed the villagers and with 8-10 persons he had reached the place of occurrence, but when Narain Baraik could not be found, they went to Sisai Police Station. In the police station, the fard beyan of his brother-in- law was recorded and the police had come in the night and in the morning near the field his elder brother was found lying in an injured condition. He was in his senses and was taken by the villagers to Sisai Hospital where he died. He has proved his signature on the inquest report, which has been marked as Exhibit 2.

In cross-examination, he has deposed that his brother Narain Baraik used to stay at Barbatoli as a Ghar-jamai.

8. P.W. 3 – Kunka Baraik is the informant and the sole eye-witness of the occurrence. He has stated that on the date of occurrence, it was around 11:00 P.M. and he was sleeping in Mahrapara in the house of Matukdhari Master and Narain Baraik was sleeping outside the house when the accused persons had come variously armed and started committing assault upon Narain

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top