SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 548

RAJESH SHANKAR
Pano Hansda – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: A.K. Das, Sahay Gaurav Piyush
For the Respondents: Arup Kumar Dey, Durga Charan Mishra, Abhijeet Anand

ORDER :

1. The present criminal revision has been filed against the judgment dated 30.09.2003 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dumka in Crl. Misc. No. 70 of 2002 [T.R. No. 5 of 2003 (F.C.) whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 was dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner being legally wedded wife of the opposite party no. 2, had filed an application under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. for issuance of direction upon the opposite party no. 2, who was in service of Border Security Force to pay her maintenance of Rs.3,000/- per month. The marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with the opposite party no. 2 on 22nd April, 1986 in accordance with Hindu rites and rituals. After the marriage, the petitioner was brought to the house of the opposite party no. 2, but she was always subjected to torture by the opposite party no. 2 and his parents. She was harassed and assaulted as well as denied proper food and clothing. Therefore, she filed a case under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code against her in-laws and the husband (the opposite party no. 2) which was pending for disposal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top