SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Manish Patwari – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Higher & Technical Education – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
Prayer
1. The instant writ petition has been filed, by way of pro bono publico, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the following reliefs:
(ii) For issuance of further appropriate writ/order/direction including Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent- Ranchi University, Ranchi to immediately and forthwith issue necessary directions to its 13 Constituent Colleges to take admission of students in the Intermediate Courses for Academic Session 2024-26, especially because due to non-admission of the students in the Intermediate Course
A.P. State Financial Corpn. v. Gar Re-Rolling Mills (1994) 2 SCC 647
Ashok Kumar Pandey v. State of W.B.
Buddhi Kota Subbarao (Dr) v. K. Parasaran (1996) 5 SCC 530
State of Maharashtra v. Prabhu (1994) 2 SCC 481
State of Uttaranchal vs. Balwant Singh Chaufal and Ors. (2010) 3 SCC 402
Public Interest Litigation must represent genuine public interest, not individual grievances, to be maintainable.
Educational institutions receiving state assistance fall under the definition of 'State' in Article 12, making them subject to judicial review under Article 226.
Matter pertains to the internal affairs of an unaided Non-Government Educational Institution, a writ petition would not be maintainable against the unaided private Institution, as an alternative reme....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.