Back
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Sukhdev Ram S/o Ram Prasad Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
By the Court:- Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding including the First Information Report in connection with Bishunpur P.S. Case No.10 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. Case No.216 of 2013 which upon being committed to Court of Sessions, has been registered as S.T. Case No.313 of 2017.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in S.T. Case No.313 of 2017 trial is yet to begin.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 jointly draw the attention of this Court towards Interlocutory Application No.8561 of 2024 which is supported by the separate affidavits of the opposite party No.2 who is the alleged victim and the petitioner and jointly submit that therein, it has been mentioned that the petitioner and the opposite party no.2 are in fact husband and wife and they have been blessed with a daughter and the petitioner and opposite party no.2 are leading a happy married life. It is next submitted that on the date of alleged occurrence admittedly the op
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure when a private dispute is settled, and continuation would be an abuse of process.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if the parties have settled their disputes, provided the offences are not heinous and the continuatio....
Quashing of criminal proceedings is justified in cases of private disputes with a remote possibility of conviction to prevent oppression and prejudice to the accused.
High Court quashed non-heinous private dispute criminal proceedings upon voluntary compromise, as continuation would abuse process, render conviction remote, and cause prejudice, following guidelines....
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings based on compromise in private disputes if it serves justice and prevents abuse of process.
High Court may quash non-heinous private dispute proceedings under inherent powers where parties fully compromise, conviction becomes remote, and continuation abuses process.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties if the dispute is private, not heinous, and continuation of proceedings would cause injustice.
The High Court can quash FIRs in cases of private disputes where parties have settled, preventing abuse of process and securing justice.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the power to quash criminal proceedings should be exercised to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of any court. In....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
