SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Ranchi Pahari Mandir Vikas Samiti, Ranchi, represented through its Member Rajesh Gadodia, Son of Krishna Murari Gadodia – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand, through Chief Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Heard Mr. Abhay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Sachin Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State through Video Conferencing, Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned senior counsel for the Respondent No.2 and Mr. Sumit Prakash Learned counsel for the respondent no.5.
2. At the outset a preliminary objection was made by Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned senior counsel for the respondent no.2 with regard to maintainability of the writ petition in the light of provision made under section 29 of the Jharkhand Hindu Religious Trust Act. He submits that only appeal can be maintained before the learned District Judge. This objection will be dealt with by this Court later on in the judgment.
3. The prayer in the writ petition is made for quashing the Notification No. 1204 of 2023 dated 11.09.2023 issued under the signature of the respondent no.2 whereby a validly constituted committee which is running the Pahari Mandir Temple without any rhyme or reason was substituted by invoking the section 29 of the Bihar (Jharkhand) Hindu Religious Trust Act, 1950 which was headed by the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi. Further prayer is made for quashing the
Dr. Subramanian Swamy Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and others
Bihar State Board of Religious Trusts and Another Vs. Vishwanath Prasad Lohia and Others
Hindu Public and Another Vs. Rajdhani Puja Samithee and others
Andhra Pradesh Financial Corporation Versus Gar Re-Rolling Mills
Supersession of a religious trust committee must comply with statutory provisions; failure to do so renders the action arbitrary and subject to judicial review.
The court ruled that actions taken by the State Hindu Religious Trust Board were without jurisdiction due to non-compliance with statutory provisions, affirming the private nature of the religious tr....
Writ petitions concerning the administration of religious institutions must adhere to the statutory framework provided by relevant laws, rather than seeking relief through Article 226.
The appointment of non-hereditary trustees is valid under the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act when there is evidence of mismanagement by hereditary trustees, and full legal procedures a....
Once the Court has intrinsic material to accept that the faith or the belief is genuine and not a pretence, it must defer to the belief of the worshipper This, we must do well to recognise, applies a....
The Commissioner must decide on renovation proposals in accordance with statutory provisions, ensuring no unauthorized demolition occurs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.