Kerala HC Issues Notice to Digi Yatra Foundation in PIL Seeking Strict Compliance with DPDP Act 2023 for Airport Passenger Data: High Court of Kerala
07 Mar 2026
Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
CJI Kant: Action Needed for More Women Judges
10 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Most. Kalindri Devi, wife of late Ramu Singh – Appellant
Versus
Leela Devi, wife of Rambakas Singh – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. This second appeal has been preferred under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree of affirmance dated 26.08.2016 passed by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-VII, Ranchi in Title Appeal No.56 of 2010 whereby and where under, the learned first appellate court has confirmed the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial court being the Additional Munsif-I, Ranchi in Title Suit No. 67 of 1998 dated 07.04.2010 and dismissed the appeal.
3. The brief fact of the case is that the appellant-plaintiff filed Title Suit No. 67 of 1998 in the court of Munsif, Ranchi with the prayer for declaration that sale deed no. 6295 dated 24.06.1986 executed by plaintiff in favour of the defendant, is null and void. The plaintiff further sought declaration of her title over the suit land as also declaration of her possession. The plaintiff made an alternative prayer that if during the pendency of the suit the plaintiff is found to be not i
Fraud in civil proceedings must be proven beyond reasonable doubt; failure to establish fraud led to dismissal of the suit as barred by limitation.
The application of Section 17 of the Limitation Act to protect the rights of a party defrauded from lapse of time until they remain in ignorance of the fraud, and the presumption of validity of a reg....
A sale deed is void if no consideration was paid; registration does not validate it, and its improper registration does not confer title.
Allegations of fraud must be substantially proved, and in cases of instruments voidable on the ground of fraud, the time for limitation runs from the date when the plaintiff becomes aware of the frau....
The suit seeking a declaration that the sale deed was null and void was barred by limitation as the plaintiffs were aware of the sale deed way back in 1975, and the suit was filed in 2004. The burden....
A party alleging fraud must provide specific evidence to substantiate claims, and registered documents have a presumption of validity, which must be rebutted.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article