SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 37

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, MR. JUSTICE NAVNEET KUMAR, JJ
Gopal Bagti Son Of Late Manga Ram Bagti - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Jharkhand - Respondent
Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 918 of 2006
Decided On : 11-02-2025

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. R.P. Gupta, Advocate
:Mr. Kumar Rahul Kamlesh, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mrs. Vandana Bharti, APP.

Conviction can be upheld based on the reliable testimony of a sole eyewitness, irrespective of the presence of corroborating evidence or independent witnesses, as long as the evidence is credible.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Prevention of Witch (DAAIN) Practices Act - Sections 3/4/5/6 - Conviction for double murder - The appellant was found guilty under Section 302 IPC for murdering the parents of the informant based on the testimony of a sole eyewitness who testified about being present during the attack, leading to their deaths from sharp weapon injuries. (Paras 1-75)

(B) Evidence - Reliance on eyewitness - The conviction can be based on the testimony of a single eyewitness if it is found to be trustworthy and credible, irrespective of the absence of independent witnesses or corroborative evidence. (Paras 38-40)

(C) Motive - The court held that motive does not need to be proven if direct evidence substantiates the commission of the crime, reaffirming that the relationship of witnesses to the deceased does not discredit their testimony. (Paras 48-56)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was accused of the double murder of two individuals identified as Soma and Bangi Mundarin, allegedly motivated by claims that the victims practiced witchcraft, causing the death of the accused's children. The informant, a daughter of the victims, was the sole eyewitness to the attack, which occurred at night in their home.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the conviction based on the eyewitness testimony and corroborating medical evidence indicating cause and nature of deaths.

Issues: The court addressed the admissibility and reliability of the sole eyewitness testimony, along with the concept of motive and whether the absence of corroborative evidence affected the conviction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the credibility of the eyewitness testimony sufficed for conviction, regardless of the absence of corroborative evidence, and that the motive, while important, was not determinative in the presence of direct evidence.

Result: The appeal is dismissed, upholding the conviction and life sentence.

Table of Content
1. background and details of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. witnesses and trial process (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
3. arguments presented by both parties (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. court's analysis of evidence (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
5. detailed witness testimonies (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 31)
6. discussion on the reliability of witness testimony (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
7. legal standards for conviction based on eyewitness (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
8. evaluation of motive and corroborative evidence (Para 43 , 44 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)
9. interpretation of motives in light of evidence (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55)
10. procedural issues and their implications (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60)
11. conclusion on the reliability of evidence (Para 61 , 62 , 63)
12. final assessment of evidence supporting the conviction (Para 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69)
13. final decision and order of the court (Para 71 , 72 , 73)

JUDGMENT :

Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.

1. The instant appeals are directed Judgment of conviction dated 03.04.2006 and order of sentence dated 04.04.2006, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Chaibasa, in Sessions Trial No.227 of 2004 arising out of Bandgaon P.S. Case No.14 of 2004 (G.R. Case No.131 of 2004) registered under Section 3 02 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and under Sections 3 /4/5/6 of the Prevention of Witch (DAAIN) Practices Act for committing murder of Soma @ Nathu Ram Munda and his wife Bangi Mundarin by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 3 02 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (IPC) and have been directed to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence under Section 3 02 IPC.

Factual Matrix

2. This Court, before proceeding to examine the legality and propriety of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, deems it fit and proper to refer the background of institution of prosecution case. The prosecution story in brief as per the allegation made in the First Information Report reads hereunder as :-

3. According to the fardbeyan of the informant Jawani Mundarin daughter of Soma Nathu Ram Munda on the preceding night (14.6.04) after taking food she went to sleep in the room along with her mother while her father slept in another room. In the mid night about 1“o” clock one person forced upon the door of the room and entered. She enquired and came out of the room. It was raining outside. He asked her to put on light. In the light she identified him as Gopal Bagti who lived in Bandgaon. He was carrying Chapad (sharp edge weapon) in his hand.

4. Gopal Bagti told her to put off the light, when she enquired, he disclosed that her parent, were Witch and they were responsible for the death of his children and as such he is going to kill them. He also threatened her that if she raised hulla she will also be murdered. She did not put off the light Gopal Bagti started inflicting repeated blows on the head of his father. The informant tried to run away but accused did not allow her to escape. Her father started writhing in pain. When her mother got up Gopal Bagti assaulting her with the chapad.

5. The informant somehow managed to flee away and started raising hulla. It was raining outside and no body gathered on her cries. After sometime Gopal Bagti fled away from the place of occurrence. The informant returned back to her house and saw her parents (mother & father) dead in a pool of blood.

6. She has also stated that her brother lives in Lupungdih village with his family. It was not possible to give the information in the night. She informed the matter in the morning and subsequently the police and the village Munda reached her house.

7. On the basis of the statement of the informant, FIR being Bandgaon Police Station Case No. 14/04 dated 15.06.2004 was registered against the accused under Section 3 02 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and under Sections 3 /4/5/6 of the Prevention of Witch (DAAIN) Practices Act and after due investigation

                                                                                              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                                                              1
                                                                                              2
                                                                                              3
                                                                                              4
                                                                                              5
                                                                                              6
                                                                                              7
                                                                                              8
                                                                                              9
                                                                                              10
                                                                                              11
                                                                                              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                                                              supreme today icon
                                                                                              logo-black

                                                                                              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                                                              Please visit our Training & Support
                                                                                              Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                                                              qr

                                                                                              Scan Me!

                                                                                              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                                                              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                                                              whatsapp-icon Back to top